17q12, explained for kidsdeletion syndrome · static snapshot
Everything here was found on the internet and put together with help from a computer program that reads and writes (AI). It is here so you can learn — it is not the final word. Always check the real source. Read the whole notice
A number from a study What scientists are working on 1 supporting source confidence 97% novelty 60%

To mitigate false positives, we used previously benchmarked filtering thresholds, where CNVs had to span >4 callable exo

A source reports “0.1%” in the context of general: “To mitigate false positives, we used previously benchmarked filtering thresholds, where CNVs had to span >4 callable exons and had a site frequency <0.1% and a quality score >200.”

How this was derived

Numbers are quoted verbatim from the source; check the source before quoting onward.

Generated 2026-11-13, last changed yesterday. Dedup key freq:0.1%. The engine re-checks this insight on every analysis run; if more sources agree, its corroboration and confidence go up and it reappears as “new”.

Evidence (1 quote)

To mitigate false positives, we used previously benchmarked filtering thresholds, where CNVs had to span >4 callable exons and had a site frequency <0.1% and a quality score >200.

Supporting documents (1)

StorySourcePublishedSeenRelevance
Exome sequencing of 20,979 individuals with epilepsy reveals shared... pmc 2024-01-01 yesterday 1.00