17q12 Knowledge Basedeletion syndrome · static snapshot
All content was collected from public internet sources and processed with the help of AI/LLM software. This site is informative only — do not draw conclusions; verify with the original sources. Full disclaimer
Frequency / statistic Research frontier 1 supporting source confidence 97% novelty 60%

To mitigate false positives, we used previously benchmarked filtering thresholds, where CNVs had to span >4 callable exo

A source reports “0.1%” in the context of general: “To mitigate false positives, we used previously benchmarked filtering thresholds, where CNVs had to span >4 callable exons and had a site frequency <0.1% and a quality score >200.”

How this was derived

Numbers are quoted verbatim from the source; check the source before quoting onward.

Generated 2026-11-13, last changed yesterday. Dedup key freq:0.1%. The engine re-checks this insight on every analysis run; if more sources agree, its corroboration and confidence go up and it reappears as “new”.

Evidence (1 quote)

To mitigate false positives, we used previously benchmarked filtering thresholds, where CNVs had to span >4 callable exons and had a site frequency <0.1% and a quality score >200.

Supporting documents (1)

DocumentSourcePublishedSeenRelevance
Exome sequencing of 20,979 individuals with epilepsy reveals shared... pmc 2024-01-01 yesterday 1.00